Search for: All records

Abstract Ectomycorrhizal (EM) effects on forest ecosystem carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling are highly variable, which may be due to underappreciated functional differences among EM‐associating trees. We hypothesise that differences in functional traits among EM tree genera will correspond to differences in soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics.We explored how differences among three genera of angiosperm EM trees (Quercus,Carya, andTilia) in functional traits associated with leaf litter quality, resource use and allocation patterns, and microbiome assembly related to overall soil biogeochemical properties.We found consistent differences among EM tree genera in functional traits.Quercustrees had lower litter quality, lower δ¹³C in SOM, higher δ¹⁵N in leaf tissues, greater oxidative extracellular enzyme activities, and higher EM fungal diversity thanTiliatrees, whileCaryatrees were often intermediary. These functional traits corresponded to overall SOM‐C and N dynamics and soil fungal and bacterial community composition.Our findings suggest that trait variation among EM‐associating tree species should be an important consideration in assessing plant–soil relationships such that EM trees cannot be categorised as a unified functional guild. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog. 

PremiseNutrients, light, water, and temperature are key factors limiting the growth of individual plants in nature. Mutualistic interactions between plants and microbes often mediate resource limitation for both partners. In the mutualism between legumes and rhizobia, plants provide rhizobia with carbon in exchange for fixed nitrogen. Because partner quality in mutualisms is genotype‐dependent, within‐species genetic variation is expected to alter the responses of mutualists to changes in the resource environment. Here we ask whether partner quality variation in rhizobia mediates the response of host plants to changing light availability, and conversely, whether light alters the expression of partner quality variation. MethodsWe inoculated clover hosts with 11 strains ofRhizobium leguminosarumthat differed in partner quality, grew plants under either ambient or low light conditions in the greenhouse, and measured plant growth, nodule traits, and foliar nutrient composition. ResultsLight availability and rhizobium inoculum interactively determined plant growth, and variation in rhizobium partner quality was more apparent in ambient light. ConclusionsOur results suggest that variation in the costs and benefits of rhizobium symbionts mediate host responses to light availability and that rhizobium strain variation might more important in higher‐light environments. Our work adds to a growing appreciation for the role of microbial intraspecific and interspecific diversity in mediating extended phenotypes in their hosts and suggests an important role for light availability in the ecology and evolution of legume–rhizobium symbiosis.